On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:48 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Ensure we cannot crash if the GPIO device gets unregistered (and the > chip pointer set to NULL) during any of the API calls. > > To that end: wait for all users of gdev->chip to exit their read-only > SRCU critical sections in gpiochip_remove(). > > For brevity: add a guard class which can be instantiated at the top of > every function requiring read-only access to the chip pointer and use it > in all API calls taking a GPIO descriptor as argument. In places where > we only deal with the GPIO device - use regular guard() helpers and > rcu_dereference() for chip access. Do the same in API calls taking a > const pointer to gpio_desc. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> The way I read it after this the gpio character device is well protected against the struct gpio_chip going away, good work! Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> I would perhaps slot in some documentation around struct gpio_chip_guard explaining how this works and why it is needed. Yours, Linus Walleij