On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:17:30AM -0800, brgl@xxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:42:20 +0100, "Paul E. McKenney" > <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:28:19AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:24 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:02:40AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > >> > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 3:21 AM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi Bartosz, > >> > > > > >> > > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > >> > > > > >> > > > [auto build test WARNING on brgl/gpio/for-next] > >> > > > [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.8-rc2 next-20240130] > >> > > > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > >> > > > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > >> > > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > >> > > > > >> > > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bartosz-Golaszewski/gpio-protect-the-list-of-GPIO-devices-with-SRCU/20240130-205537 > >> > > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git gpio/for-next > >> > > > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240130124828.14678-21-brgl%40bgdev.pl > >> > > > patch subject: [PATCH 20/22] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU > >> > > > config: x86_64-randconfig-122-20240131 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240131/202401311050.YNdm98Hv-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > >> > > > compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 > >> > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240131/202401311050.YNdm98Hv-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) > >> > > > > >> > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > >> > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > >> > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401311050.YNdm98Hv-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > >> > > > > >> > > > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:444:22: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:444:22: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:444:22: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1103:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1103:9: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1103:9: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1182:22: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1182:22: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1182:22: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:2970:14: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:2970:14: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:2970:14: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3004:22: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3004:22: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3004:22: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3585:14: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3585:14: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3585:14: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:4772:14: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:4772:14: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:4772:14: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:4846:14: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:4846:14: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:4846:14: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c: note: in included file: > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip [noderef] __rcu * > >> > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h:202:1: sparse: struct gpio_chip * > >> > > > > >> > > > vim +444 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > >> > > > > >> > > > 422 > >> > > > 423 /* > >> > > > 424 * Convert a GPIO name to its descriptor > >> > > > 425 * Note that there is no guarantee that GPIO names are globally unique! > >> > > > 426 * Hence this function will return, if it exists, a reference to the first GPIO > >> > > > 427 * line found that matches the given name. > >> > > > 428 */ > >> > > > 429 static struct gpio_desc *gpio_name_to_desc(const char * const name) > >> > > > 430 { > >> > > > 431 struct gpio_device *gdev; > >> > > > 432 struct gpio_desc *desc; > >> > > > 433 struct gpio_chip *gc; > >> > > > 434 > >> > > > 435 if (!name) > >> > > > 436 return NULL; > >> > > > 437 > >> > > > 438 guard(srcu)(&gpio_devices_srcu); > >> > > > 439 > >> > > > 440 list_for_each_entry_srcu(gdev, &gpio_devices, list, > >> > > > 441 srcu_read_lock_held(&gpio_devices_srcu)) { > >> > > > 442 guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu); > >> > > > 443 > >> > > > > 444 gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip); > >> > > > 445 if (!gc) > >> > > > 446 continue; > >> > > > 447 > >> > > > 448 for_each_gpio_desc(gc, desc) { > >> > > > 449 if (desc->name && !strcmp(desc->name, name)) > >> > > > 450 return desc; > >> > > > 451 } > >> > > > 452 } > >> > > > 453 > >> > > > 454 return NULL; > >> > > > 455 } > >> > > > 456 > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > >> > > > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki > >> > > > >> > > Paul, > >> > > > >> > > Should I care about these warnings? They seem to be emitted for a lot > >> > > of RCU code already upstream. I'm not even sure how I'd go about > >> > > addressing them honestly. > >> > > >> > This is maintainer's choice. > >> > > >> > The fix would be to apply __rcu to the definition of ->chip. The benefit > >> > is that it finds bugs where rcu-protected pointers are used without RCU > >> > primitives and vice versa. > >> > >> Ah, good point. I marked the other RCU-protected fields like > >> descriptor label but forgot this one. > >> > >> It also seems like I need to use __rcu for all function arguments > >> taking an RCU-protected pointer as argument? > > > > Not if that argument gets its value from rcu_dereference(), which is > > the usual pattern. > > > > And if you are passing an RCU-protected pointer to a function *before* > > passing it through rcu_dereference(), I would have some questions for you. > > > > Or are you instead passing a pointer to an RCU-protected pointer as an > > argument to your functions? > > No, I'm not. Thanks for making it clear. With the following changes to the > series, the warnings are now gone: > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c > index 6a421309319e..15349f92d0ec 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c > @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_unexport); > > int gpiochip_sysfs_register(struct gpio_device *gdev) > { > - struct gpio_chip *chip = gdev->chip; > + struct gpio_chip *chip; This is protected by an update-side lock, correct? > struct device *parent; > struct device *dev; > > @@ -775,6 +775,12 @@ int gpiochip_sysfs_register(struct gpio_device *gdev) > if (!class_is_registered(&gpio_class)) > return 0; > > + guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu); > + > + chip = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip); If so, you rely on that lock's protection by replacing the above two lines of code with something like this: chip = rcu_dereference_protected(gdev->chip, lockdep_is_held(&my_lock)); > + if (!chip) > + return -ENODEV; > + > /* > * For sysfs backward compatibility we need to preserve this > * preferred parenting to the gpio_chip parent field, if set. > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > index 7ecdd8cc39c5..ea0675514891 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ struct gpio_chip *gpiod_to_chip(const struct > gpio_desc *desc) > { > if (!desc) > return NULL; > - return desc->gdev->chip; > + return rcu_dereference(desc->gdev->chip); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_to_chip); > > @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_device_get_label); > */ > struct gpio_chip *gpio_device_get_chip(struct gpio_device *gdev) > { > - return gdev->chip; > + return rcu_dereference(gdev->chip); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_get_chip); > > @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static int gpiochip_setup_dev(struct gpio_device *gdev) > goto err_remove_device; > > dev_dbg(&gdev->dev, "registered GPIOs %d to %d on %s\n", gdev->base, > - gdev->base + gdev->ngpio - 1, gdev->chip->label ? : "generic"); > + gdev->base + gdev->ngpio - 1, gdev->label); I don't know enough to comment here, but the rest of the look good to me. > return 0; > > @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip > *gc, void *data, > return -ENOMEM; > gdev->dev.bus = &gpio_bus_type; > gdev->dev.parent = gc->parent; > - WRITE_ONCE(gdev->chip, gc); > + rcu_assign_pointer(gdev->chip, gc); > > gc->gpiodev = gdev; > gpiochip_set_data(gc, data); > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > index c76acb8f95c6..07443d26cbca 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct gpio_device { > int id; > struct device *mockdev; > struct module *owner; > - struct gpio_chip *chip; > + struct gpio_chip __rcu *chip; > struct gpio_desc *descs; > int base; > u16 ngpio; > > Bartosz