Hi Maria, I wanted to apply this v3 patch, but I can't figure out what it is based on? Could you rebase the patch on v6.8-rc1 and resend? Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add lock to ensure the state atomization
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add lock to ensure the state atomization
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 23:43:12 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20231225082305.12343-1-quic_aiquny@quicinc.com>
- References: <20231225082305.12343-1-quic_aiquny@quicinc.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add lock to ensure the state atomization
- From: Aiqun Yu (Maria)
- Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add lock to ensure the state atomization
- References:
- [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add lock to ensure the state atomization
- From: Maria Yu
- [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add lock to ensure the state atomization
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: move suspend()/resume() callbacks to noirq
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: st: Return pinctrl_gpio_direction_output to transfer the error
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add lock to ensure the state atomization
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add lock to ensure the state atomization
- Index(es):
 |