Re: [PATCH 02/14] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: move suspend/resume to suspend_noirq/resume_noirq

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:33 PM Thomas Richard
<thomas.richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 1/19/24 17:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 6:08 PM Thomas Richard
> > <thomas.richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 1/15/24 21:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 6:16 PM Thomas Richard
> >>> <thomas.richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> >>>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops pinctrl_single_pm_ops = {
> >>>> +       SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pinctrl_single_suspend_noirq,
> >>>> +                                     pinctrl_single_resume_noirq)
> >>>> +};
> >>>
> >>> Use proper / modern macro.
> >>
> >> fixed, use DEFINE_NOIRQ_DEV_PM_OPS now
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>>>  #endif
> >>>
> >>> Why ifdeferry is needed (esp. taking into account pm_ptr() use below)?
> >>
> >> We may have an "unused variable" warning for pinctrl_single_pm_ops if
> >> CONFIG_PM is undefined (due to pm_ptr).
> >
> > This is coupled with the above. Fixing above will automatically make
> > the right thing.
>
> Yes you're right.
> By the way I can use pm_sleep_ptr instead of pm_ptr.

Yes, pm_sleep_ptr() is the correct one in this case.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko