Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] Improve IRQ wake capability reporting and update the cros_ec driver to use it

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 04:54:14PM -0700, Mark Hasemeyer wrote:
> Currently the cros_ec driver assumes that its associated interrupt is
> wake capable. This is an incorrect assumption as some Chromebooks use a
> separate wake pin, while others overload the interrupt for wake and IO.
> This patch train updates the driver to query the underlying ACPI/DT data
> to determine whether or not the IRQ should be enabled for wake.
> 
> Both the device tree and ACPI systems have methods for reporting IRQ
> wake capability. In device tree based systems, a node can advertise
> itself as a 'wakeup-source'. In ACPI based systems, GpioInt and
> Interrupt resource descriptors can use the 'SharedAndWake' or
> 'ExclusiveAndWake' share types.
> 
> Some logic is added to the platform, ACPI, and DT subsystems to more
> easily pipe wakeirq information up to the driver.

Just wondering if you used --histogram diff algo when preparing patches.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko