On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:53:07PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 04:30:24PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 09:51:04AM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > > > The size of struct linereq may exceed a page, so allocate space for > > > it using kvzalloc() instead of kzalloc(). > > > > It might be this needs a bit of elaboration. The kmalloc() tries to allocate > > a contiguous (in physical address space) chunk of memory and with fragmented > > memory it might be not possible. So the above issue might (rarely) happen. > > In most cases the call to kmalloc() will succeed. > > For sure, the kzalloc() generally works - or we wouldn't've gotten this > far as tests with MAX_LINES would've been failing. > We are targetting a very niche failure mode here. > > The size allocated can only be determined at runtime, may be more or > less than a page, and we don't care whether the physical memory allocated > is contiguous. > As such kvzalloc() is the appropriate allocator. > > Are you suggesting repeating the relevant sections of the > kmalloc/vmalloc() documentation or Memory Allocation Guide as part of the > checkin comment? I suggesting to make clear in the commit message that: - there is no bug per se with the code logic (i.o.w. there is no issue to have allocations bigger than one page) - this is very rarely case when it might be a problem You can also put a reference to the documentation, if you wish. This should be harmless and adding not more than a line into the commit message (or even as a Link: tag to the HTML variant of it). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko