On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:53 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Rename two functions that read or modify the global GPIO device list but > don't take the lock themselves (and need to be called with it already > acquired). Use the _unlocked() suffix which seems to be used quite > consistently across the kernel despite there also existing the _locked() > suffix for the same purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] gpiolib: rename static functions that are called with the lock taken
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] gpiolib: rename static functions that are called with the lock taken
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 12:17:46 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20231215155300.21186-2-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- References: <20231215155300.21186-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20231215155300.21186-2-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- References:
- [PATCH v3 0/2] gpiolib: protect the list of GPIO devices with a mutex
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [PATCH v3 1/2] gpiolib: rename static functions that are called with the lock taken
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [PATCH v3 0/2] gpiolib: protect the list of GPIO devices with a mutex
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: create common LPASS LPI schema
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpiolib: use a mutex to protect the list of GPIO devices
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v3 1/2] gpiolib: rename static functions that are called with the lock taken
- Next by thread: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpiolib: use a mutex to protect the list of GPIO devices
- Index(es):
 |