On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 08:18:01AM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:07:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > - it adds complications for no benefit > > It provides a placeholder for collective documentation and clarifies > scope for the reader. Turns out kernel-doc can't deal with a struct variable declaration - it needs the struct to be named. So this doesn't parse: static struct { struct rb_root tree; spinlock_t lock; } supinfo; but this does: static struct supinfo { struct rb_root tree; spinlock_t lock; } supinfo; at which point I prefer the separate struct and var declarations as per the patch. Opinions? Cheers, Kent.