Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: add exynosautov920 pinctrl

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/12/2023 12:41, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> Add pinctrl data for ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> It has a newly applied pinctrl register layer for ExynosAuto series.
> 
> Pinctrl data for ExynosAutoV920 SoC.
>  - GPA0,GPA1 (10): External wake up interrupt
>  - GPQ0 (2): SPMI (PMIC I/F)
>  - GPB0,GPB1,GPB2,GPB3,GPB4,GPB5,GPB6 (47): I2S Audio
>  - GPH0,GPH1,GPH2,GPH3,GPH4,GPH5,GPH6,GPH8 (49): PCIE, UFS, Ethernet
>  - GPG0,GPG1,GPG2,GPG3,GPG4,GPG5 (29): General purpose
>  - GPP0,GPP1,GPP2,GPP3,GPP4,GPP5,GPP6,GPP7,GPP8,GPP9,GPP10 (77): USI
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c    | 140 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c      |  23 ++-
>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.h      |  25 ++++
>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c     |   2 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.h     |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c
> index cb965cf93705..a998c296dd05 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c
> @@ -796,3 +796,143 @@ const struct samsung_pinctrl_of_match_data fsd_of_data __initconst = {
>  	.ctrl		= fsd_pin_ctrl,
>  	.num_ctrl	= ARRAY_SIZE(fsd_pin_ctrl),
>  };
> +
> +/* pin banks of exynosautov920 pin-controller 0 (ALIVE) */
> +static const struct samsung_pin_bank_data exynosautov920_pin_banks0[] = {
> +	EXYNOSV920_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0x0000, "gpa0", 0x18, 0x24, 0x28),
> +	EXYNOSV920_PIN_BANK_EINTW(2, 0x1000, "gpa1", 0x18, 0x20, 0x24),
> +	EXYNOS850_PIN_BANK_EINTN(2, 0x2000, "gpq0"),
> +};

Applied with re-ordering it, to keep it after ExynosAutov9. For the
future: don't add entries to the end of lists because it causes exactly
this issue we have here: unnecessary conflicts. Please keep this rule
for entire development, not only pinctrl.

If both you and Peter were observing this basic rule, I would not have
work of reshuffling and fixing conflicts.

Please check the result if I reshuffled/solved conflicts correctly.

Best regards,
Krzysztof