On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:37 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Linus, Andy, > > Please pull the following changes into your trees for the next merge window. > These are the patches providing a safer alternative for gpiochip_is_requested() > before we rework the locking in GPIOLIB. I pulled this into the pin control devel branch. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [GIT PULL] gpio: immutable branch between the GPIO and pinctrl trees for v6.8-rc1
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] gpio: immutable branch between the GPIO and pinctrl trees for v6.8-rc1
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:46:59 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20231208083650.25015-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- References: <20231208083650.25015-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- References:
- [GIT PULL] gpio: immutable branch between the GPIO and pinctrl trees for v6.8-rc1
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [GIT PULL] gpio: immutable branch between the GPIO and pinctrl trees for v6.8-rc1
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: drop common properties
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] pinctrl: Convert struct group_desc to use struct pingroup
- Previous by thread: [GIT PULL] gpio: immutable branch between the GPIO and pinctrl trees for v6.8-rc1
- Next by thread: [PATCH v2 0/2] gpiolib: protect the list of GPIO devices with a mutex
- Index(es):
 |