Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add missing port pins for RZ/Five SoC

["Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Geert,

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 3:32 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 3:44 PM Lad, Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:47 AM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This patch series intends to incorporate the absent port pins P19 to P28,
> > > which are exclusively available on the RZ/Five SoC.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Prabhakar
> > >
> > > RFC -> v2:
> > > * Fixed review comments pointed by Geert & Biju
> > >
> > > RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230630120433.49529-3-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
> > >
> > > Lad Prabhakar (3):
> > >   pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Include pinmap in RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK()
> > >     macro
> > >   pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add the missing port pins P19 to P28
> > >   riscv: dts: renesas: r9a07g043f: Update gpio-ranges property
> > >
> > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043f.dtsi |   4 +
> > >  drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c     | 263 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  2 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > >
> > Gentle ping.
>
> As the kernel test robot reported a build issue for PATCH 1/3, I had
> removed this series from my review queue.
Strange patchwork status didnt mention it as "rejected".

> Do you still want me to review v2, or do you want to send a v3 first?
>
No worries, I'll send a v3 and we can go from there.

Cheers,
Prabhakar