Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: don't use gpiod_to_chip()

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:40 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:01 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:06 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:43 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:50 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's start working towards removing gpiod_to_chip() from the kernel.
> > > > > Start with pinctrl. The first patch should go through the GPIO tree
> > > > > and become available through an immutable tag so that we can get more
> > > > > conversions in this cycle elsewhere.
> > > >
> > > > Fair enough, maybe an immutable branch with all three patches?
> > > > Probably best to merga all three into both subsystems I think.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Nah, I don't think I need to pollute the GPIO tree with every pinctrl
> > > patch. It's enough to just merge the first one into GPIO and you do
> > > the same in pinctrl.
> >
> > Fair enough, but I need that immutable branch for patch 1 so I
> > can merge the rest on top.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Linus Walleij
>
> I applied the first patch (after fixing the typo in the commit
> message) and sent you the immutable branch to pull. Please apply the
> remaining patches to the pinctrl tree directly.

Pulled it and applied the other two patches on top, thanks!

Yours,
Linus Walleij