Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: Remove unused member in struct lpi_pingroup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 08:14:09AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/11/2023 20:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The group is not used anywhere, remove it. And if needed, it should be
> > struct pingroup anyway.
> > 
> > While at it, replace kernel.h with what exactly being used.
> 
> Missing Reported-by and Closes by for LKP... Unless you discovered it
> without its report?

It's just at hand discovery.

> Missing sm8550.

And sm8650, but there LPI_FUNCTION(gpio) and I'm wondering why LKP complains
about it. It's really a maze to me.

> >  #define LPI_PINGROUP(id, soff, f1, f2, f3, f4)		\
> >  	{						\
> > -		.group.name = "gpio" #id,			\
> > -		.group.pins = gpio##id##_pins,		\
> 
> Aren't these used by core pinctrl code?

Only via APIs and pin control registered them also via APIs, so I don't think
this is being used directly. But if you see how, tell me! I spent already a few
hours on this and haven't got any clear picture in my mind.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux