On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 04:30:45PM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote: > Use devm version of gpiochip add function to handle removal for us. Seems reasonable. Consider also to convert to dev_err_probe() (in a separate change). Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx> -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: as3722: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data() to simplify remove path
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: as3722: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data() to simplify remove path
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:16:12 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20231116223045.274211-1-afd@ti.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20231116223045.274211-1-afd@ti.com>
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: don't include GPIOLIB private header
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v9 00/27] Add support for QMC HDLC, framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: as3722: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data() to simplify remove path
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: as3722: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data() to simplify remove path
- Index(es):
 |