On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 2:12 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you want to provide the end user with two years to migrate, and given > that libgpiod is the major consumer, you might want to hold off for > another year. OK then, just testing the waters. Probably we need to encourage libgpiod 2.x a bit. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] RFC: Do not enable the v1 uAPI by default
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: Do not enable the v1 uAPI by default
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2023 16:39:39 +0100
- In-reply-to: <ZUbsAhXyk-d4R2M9@rigel>
- References: <20231104-no-y-uapi1-default-v1-1-f60d318b6fbe@linaro.org> <ZUbsAhXyk-d4R2M9@rigel>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: Do not enable the v1 uAPI by default
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: Do not enable the v1 uAPI by default
- References:
- [PATCH] RFC: Do not enable the v1 uAPI by default
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: Do not enable the v1 uAPI by default
- From: Kent Gibson
- [PATCH] RFC: Do not enable the v1 uAPI by default
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] Add minimal Tensor/GS101 SoC support and Oriole/Pixel6 board
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] RFC: Do not enable the v1 uAPI by default
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] RFC: Do not enable the v1 uAPI by default
- Index(es):
 |