Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] ACPI: utils: use acpi_dev_uid_match() for matching _UID

[Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 09:11:56PM +0300, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:11:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:38 PM Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:36:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:17:28PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > > Convert manual _UID references to use standard ACPI helpers.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, while not so obvious this is the correct replacement.
> > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > I think this is the only case which would suffer from the more obvious
> > > behaviour, i.e.
> > >
> > > bool acpi_dev_uid_match(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *uid2)
> > > {
> > >         const char *uid1 = acpi_device_uid(adev);
> > >
> > >         return uid1 && uid2 && !strcmp(uid1, uid2);
> > > }
> > >
> > > That said, we can't be particularly sure about it's potential future users,
> > > especially when the usage will not be limited to just ACPI core since we're
> > > exporting it.
> > 
> > I actually agree with this, so please switch over to the above.
> 
> Will send out a v2, thanks.
> 
> Andy, can I add your review for this?

IIUC you agree with the usage format, but not the actual helper.
So I'm gonna drop it from the first patch and keep it for the rest,
except this one.

Let me know if I'm doing this wrong.

Raag