Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] hte: Improve GPIO handling and other cleanups

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:59 AM Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/23 1:26 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > This is a series that provides a new API to GPIO library (so far only
> > available in the GPIO tree), and respective update to the Tegra
> > HTE driver. On top a couple of other cleaups (patches 3 & 4, they
> > can be applied separately).
> >
> > Patch 2 inherited tags from its respective discussion thread [1].
> >
> > Due to dependencies this either should be applied to the GPIO tree,
> > or to the HTE when GPIO updates land the upstream (optionally with
> > the first patch be applied even now to the GPIO tree independently).
> >
> > Another option is to have an immutable branch or tag, but I assume
> > that was discussed and rejected (?) in [1].
> >
> > In v2:
> > - collected tags (Linus, Dipen)
> > - fixed couple of typos (Dipen)
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20230905185309.131295-15-brgl@xxxxxxxx/ [1]
> > Cc: Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Andy Shevchenko (3):
> >   gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_fwnode()
> >   hte: tegra194: Remove redundant dev_err()
> >   hte: tegra194: Switch to LATE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
> >
> > Bartosz Golaszewski (1):
> >   hte: tegra194: don't access struct gpio_chip
> >
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 20 ++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/hte/hte-tegra194.c  | 46 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> Looks great...I am going to assume you are going to push patches 1 and 2 through
> gpio subsystem and rest through HTE, right?
>
> Reviewed-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

Yes, let me queue them right away.

Bart