Hi! 2023-10-11 at 15:02, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Use the relevant API functions to retrieve the address of the > underlying struct device instead of accessing GPIOLIB private structures > manually. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c > index 5d5cbe0130cd..48a872a8196b 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c > @@ -14,8 +14,7 @@ > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/bits.h> > #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> > -/* FIXME: stop poking around inside gpiolib */ > -#include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h" > +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h> > > struct gpiomux { > struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data data; > @@ -176,7 +175,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > for (i = 0; i < ngpios; i++) { > - struct device *gpio_dev; > + struct gpio_device *gdev; > + struct device *dev; > struct gpio_desc *gpiod; > enum gpiod_flags flag; > > @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!muxc->mux_locked) > continue; > > - /* FIXME: find a proper way to access the GPIO device */ > - gpio_dev = &gpiod->gdev->dev; > - muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(gpio_dev) == root; > + gdev = gpiod_to_gpio_device(gpiod); > + dev = gpio_device_to_device(gdev); > + muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(dev) == root; > } > > if (muxc->mux_locked) Very nice to see that wart gone! The only small question I have is if these helpers are needed elsewhere, or if a more "direct" gpiod_to_device() would have been sufficient? That said, I have zero problem with this new code as-is, and that detail is of course squarely in gpio-land. Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Peter