On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 12:15:33PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > We have a couple of pinconfig cases inside the braces which are meant for > PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE case. Although it is valid C, it makes the > code less readable and prone to misinterpretation. Limit the braces to > PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE case to avoid this. Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: cherryview: reduce scope of PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE case
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: cherryview: reduce scope of PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE case
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:28:37 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20231011064533.20549-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20231011064533.20549-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v20 1/4] usb: Add support for Intel LJCA device
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: fetch community only when we need it
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: cherryview: reduce scope of PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE case
- Next by thread: [PATCH 0/4] Add support for nuvoton ma35d1 pin control
- Index(es):
 |