Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] Add minimal Tensor/GS101 SoC support and Oriole/Pixel6 board

[Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:06:18AM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Thanks for your reply!
> 
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 08:44, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Firstly, thanks to everyone who reviewed the v1 series! V2 incorporates all
> > > the review feedback received so far.
> > >
> > > This series adds initial SoC support for the GS101 SoC and also initial board
> > > support for Pixel 6 phone (Oriole).
> > >
> > > The gs101 / Tensor SoC is also used in Pixel6a (bluejay) and Pixel 6 Pro
> > > (raven) phones. Currently DT is added for the gs101 SoC and Oriole.
> > > As you can see from the patches the SoC is based on a Samsung Exynos SoC,
> > > and therefore lots of the low level Exynos drivers can be re-used.
> > >
> > > The support added in this series consists of:
> > > * cpus
> > > * pinctrl
> > > * some CCF implementation
> > > * watchdog
> > > * uart
> > > * gpio
> >
> > So you have sent a patch series that crosses multiple subsystems, who is
> > supposed to be taking these patches?  Or do you not want them actually
> > merged?
> 
> Krzysztof indicated here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/b1598405-b01f-426a-aaba-89f2d2dc9c2e@xxxxxxxxxx/
> that he would like to be the one applying the entire series through the Samsung
> SoC tree. If that's fine with everyone (it's OK with me).

As the serial changes are not ok (see my comments on them), I don't
think they should be going through any tree at this point in time :)

Also, in your 00/XX email, say what tree you expect them to go through
so we have a chance to know that please.

thanks,

greg k-h