On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 09:53:51AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/10/2023 21:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:20 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 04/10/2023 15:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:18 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On 26/09/2023 21:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > >>>>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:denverton-pinctrl"); > >>>> > >>>> Why do you need the alias? It's the same as ID table. You most likely > >>>> miss MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() or your table is just wrong. > >>> > >>> This is cargo cult from pinctrl-broxton.c. If we want to fix, we need > >>> to fix both. > >>> Care to send patches? > >> > >> I don't understand how some other file affects this. Why do you exactly > >> need module alias here? Which use-case does not work without it (after > >> adding proper MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE())? > > > > We try to keep these drivers uniform. So, if something should be done > > differently, it should be done for all affected drivers. > > Since patch is applied, now we have two drivers to improve. > > Awesome reason. So if you add accidentally bug to one driver, it should > be copied to other file as well. I'm not sure where it's a bug, it works. The problem is implementation and I believe Mika and certainly me agree with your points that MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() is a right way to go. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko