On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:40:39AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:36 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:42 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:12 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > What is your view on Andy's and Kent's issues with the _new() name > > > > suffix? ... > > You can go with a compromise and name it better from the start, so at > > least the patches that are taking care of renaming back won't be > > needed. > > What are you talking about?! The names are *FINE*. I DON'T want to > change them. I want to keep them. The temporary renaming is there to > make the review process easier but the end effect is that the names > stay the same with only the signature changed. I just replied how to leave with renamings done only in a single place (pinctrl core). Would it work for you? > > Another way to have three or so patches with combined efforts, but still... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko