Re: [PATCH 34/36] treewide: rename pinctrl_gpio_direction_input_new()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 09:08:41PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:16 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:51 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Now that pinctrl_gpio_direction_input() is no longer used, let's drop the
> > > '_new' suffix from its improved variant.
> >
> > This and other "treewide" patches in the series are redundant. Just
> > name the functions better to begin with.
> 
> I don't want to rename these functions. They have perfectly fine
> names. I want to change their signatures and the renaming part is
> there only to make the reviewing easier.

So, then you can make them macros and based on the type of the first argument
use either old or new API, which you then make public. The all noise with
"_new" is not needed, really.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux