Re: [PATCH 04/36] gpio: cdev: use pinctrl_gpio_can_use_line_new()

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:24 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 06:17:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:02 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:50:42PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > I agree with the change in principle, just not comfortable with the naming.
> >
> > +1 here. I proposed some names, have you seen my comment(s)?
> >
>
> I have now - any of those work for me.
> Whichever is consistent with what we are using for gpiochip functions in
> gpiolib would make most sense to me.
>

Does it really matter? It's not here to stay, it's temporary and
exists only until the whole series is applied - which given that it's
limited to gpio and pinctrl, shouldn't take more than one release
cycle.

There are plenty of examples of this naming convention for temporary
symbols - there's even an ongoing effort to replace all .remove()
callbacks with .remove_new() which will then be changed back to
.remove() treewide.

Bart