On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 11:59:33AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:45:18PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > > Since Baytrail pinctrl device is not attached to acpi_lpss_pm_domain, > > runtime PM serves no purpose here. Drop it and switch to pm_sleep_ptr() > > as now we only have suspend and resume handles in place. > > > > No functional impact. > > > TODO: > > Consider moving to DEFINE_LATE_DEV_PM_OPS() in the future once we have > > enough users to account for its introduction. > > This is not related to the commit message. > I'll drop it. Ah, and next time, please do a cover letter for the series, it can be better managed from maintainer perspective. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko