On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:45:19PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > Since Lynxpoint pinctrl device is not attached to acpi_lpss_pm_domain, > runtime PM serves no purpose here. Drop it and switch to pm_sleep_ptr() > as now we only have resume handle in place. > > No functional impact. Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: lynxpoint: drop runtime PM support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: lynxpoint: drop runtime PM support
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 11:59:59 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20231003081519.27524-2-raag.jadav@intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20231003081519.27524-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20231003081519.27524-2-raag.jadav@intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: drop runtime PM support
- From: Raag Jadav
- [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: lynxpoint: drop runtime PM support
- From: Raag Jadav
- [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: drop runtime PM support
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: drop runtime PM support
- Next by Date: Re: [libgpiod][PATCH v2 2/3] bindings: rust: rename {event,settings}_clone to try_clone
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: lynxpoint: drop runtime PM support
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: lynxpoint: drop runtime PM support
- Index(es):
 |