On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 05:46:07PM -0700, Yury Norov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 08:20:07AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Currently we have a few bitmap calls that are open coded in the library > > module. Let's convert them to use generic bitmap APIs instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + bitmap_from_arr64(mask, &lv->mask, GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX); > > + bitmap_from_arr64(bits, &lv->bits, GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX); > > + > > + num_set = bitmap_gather(vals, bits, mask, lr->num_lines); > > It looks like GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX is always 64, and so I wonder: is > my understanding correct that all bits in ->mask and ->bits beyond > lr->num_lines are clear? > The lv fields come from userspace and so cannot be guaranteed to be zeroed beyond lr->num_lines. Any set bits beyond that must be ignored, one way or another. > If so, you can seemingly pass the GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX instead of > lr->num_lines, and that way it will be small_cons_nbits()-optimized. > But that would be decidedly non-optimal for the most common case where lr->num_lines == 1. Cheers, Kent.