Hi, Geert, On 14.09.2023 15:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Claudiu, > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> According to hardware manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf) >> the computation formula for PLL rate is as follows: >> >> Fout = ((m + k/65536) * Fin) / (p * 2^s) >> >> and k has values in range [-32768, 32767]. Dividing k by 65536 with >> integer variables leads all the time to zero. Thus we may have slight >> differences b/w what has been set vs. what is displayed. Thus, >> get rid of this and decompose the formula before dividing k by 65536. >> >> Fixes: ef3c613ccd68a ("clk: renesas: Add CPG core wrapper for RZ/G2L SoC") >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for your patch! > >> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c >> @@ -696,18 +696,22 @@ static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, >> struct pll_clk *pll_clk = to_pll(hw); >> struct rzg2l_cpg_priv *priv = pll_clk->priv; >> unsigned int val1, val2; >> - unsigned int mult = 1; >> - unsigned int div = 1; >> + unsigned int div; >> + u64 rate; >> + s16 kdiv; >> >> if (pll_clk->type != CLK_TYPE_SAM_PLL) >> return parent_rate; >> >> val1 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK1(pll_clk->conf)); >> val2 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK2(pll_clk->conf)); >> - mult = MDIV(val1) + KDIV(val1) / 65536; >> + kdiv = KDIV(val1); >> div = PDIV(val1) << SDIV(val2); >> >> - return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * mult, div); >> + rate = (u64)MDIV(val1) * parent_rate; >> + rate += ((long long)parent_rate * kdiv) / 65536; > > As the division is a binary shift, you can use the mul_u64_u32_shr() helper, > and incorporate the sdiv shift at the same time: > > rate += mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, KDIV(val1), 16 + SDIV(val2)); > > You can save a multiplication by premultiplying mdiv by 65536: > > rate = mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, (MDIV(val1) << 16)) + KDIV(val1), > 16 + SDIV(val2)); Looking again at this: KDIV (aka DIV_K) could have negative values thus mul_u64_u32_shr() cannot be used here. > >> + >> + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, div); > > return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, PDIV(val1)); > >> } >> >> static const struct clk_ops rzg2l_cpg_pll_ops = { > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert >