Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: sim: fix an invalid __free() usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 03:49, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Nope, k*alloc*() returns ZERO or NULL on failure. That's what most developers
> are missing :-)

Absolutely not.

k*alloc() returns NULL on failure. Absolutely nothing else.

On *success*, it can return the special ZERO_SIZE_PTR. But that is
*not* a failure at all. It's very much a successful pointer.

Now, it's a pointer that you can't actually dereference, but that's
very much intentional. You can't dereference it, because you asked for
a zero-sized allocation. You got a zero-sized allocation.

But please never *ever* think it's a failure. It's very much not a
failure case, and it is very much intentional.

It's different from NULL exactly *because* it's successful, and
exactly so that you can write

     ptr = kmalloc(size);
     if (!ptr)
          return -ENOMEM;

without having to worry about the "size is zero" case.

The standard user-space "malloc()" library is misdesigned. Surprise
surprise. The kernel isn't.

                Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux