Re: [PATCH v5] gpio: sim: fix an invalid __free() usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 01:12:16AM -0700, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:43:47 +0200, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 09:32:53AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

...

> > As for the material to be backported it's fine, but I'm wondering if we
> > actually can add the entries in a sorted manner, so we would need the exact
> > what I mentioned in previous review round, just search backwards to the first
> > satisfying entry. I don't believe the adding an entry to the list is a
> > hot-path, so would be fine to call list_sort().
> 
> Given the need for the callback function, this would result in bigger code.

Is it a problem?

On the below I kinda agree.

> Also calling:
> 
>     list_add_tail();
>     list_sort();
> 
> is not very elegant. I would possibly go for adding list_add_sorted() but
> that's a separate change for the future.

Note, we do this for the GPIO bases already.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux