Re: [PATCH 3/5] gpio: vf610: add i.MX8ULP of_device_id entry

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 7:48 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 14/09/2023 04:20, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > i.MX8ULP supports two interrupts, while i.MX7ULP supports one interrupt.
> > So from hardware perspective, they are not compatible.
> >
> > So add entry for i.MX8ULP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> > index dbc7ba0ee72c..88f7215cdf4b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static const struct fsl_gpio_soc_data imx_data = {
> >  static const struct of_device_id vf610_gpio_dt_ids[] = {
> >       { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-gpio",       .data = NULL, },
> >       { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio",     .data = &imx_data, },
> > +     { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio",     .data = &imx_data, },
>
> Why? It is the same as imx7. No need.

Because compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-gpio" is not what is going to be in the
device tree, but compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio"?

What am I missing here? Maybe the commit message is weird.

Yours,
Linus Walleij