On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 2:29 PM Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > When I've upstreamed the gpio-regmap driver, I didn't have that much > experience with kernel maintenance, so I've just added myself as a > reviewer. I've gained quite some experience, so I'd like to step up > as a maintainer for it. > Do you think about maintaining your own tree and sending PRs to me? I'm wondering if - given the little volume of changes to gpio-regmap - this wouldn't be unnecessary churn? I normally wait for you to Ack any changes to gpio-regmap code and drivers based on it anyway. Otherwise if it's just the formal role of the maintainer you're suggesting, then sure, I'm all for it. Bart > Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 69de688907ca..405f616e4960 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -8872,7 +8872,7 @@ F: drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c > F: tools/testing/selftests/gpio/ > > GPIO REGMAP > -R: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > +M: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > S: Maintained > F: drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c > F: include/linux/gpio/regmap.h > -- > 2.39.2 >