On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:35 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Instead of dereferencing pdev everywhere, just store the address of the > > underlying struct device in a local variable. > > ... > > > - return devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, > > - sprd_eic_unregister_notifier, > > + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, sprd_eic_unregister_notifier, > > &sprd_eic->irq_nb); > > Ping-pong style detected: Lines added / modified by previous patch in the same > series got modified again. > > If you look at how I do that, I introduce the temporary variable with my new > code and then reuse it later on. > > OTOH, I see that the first one is supposed to be backported (?) in such case > perhaps it's fine. I would typically do the same but the fix comes first in series. Bart