Re: [PATCH v5] gpio: sim: don't fiddle with GPIOLIB private members

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 1:07 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We access internals of struct gpio_device and struct gpio_desc because
> it's easier but it can actually be avoided and we're working towards a
> better encapsulation of GPIO data structures across the kernel so let's
> start at home.
>
> Instead of checking gpio_desc flags, let's just track the requests of
> GPIOs in the driver. We also already store the information about
> direction of simulated lines.
>
> For kobjects needed by sysfs callbacks: we can iterate over the children
> devices of the top-level platform device and compare their fwnodes
> against the one passed to the init function from probe.
>
> While at it: fix one line break and remove the untrue part about
> configfs callbacks using dev_get_drvdata() from a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Patch applied.

Bart




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux