Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: rename gpio_set_debounce_timeout() for consistency

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 11:25 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > All other functions that manipulate a struct gpio_desc use the gpiod_
> > prefix. Follow this convention and rename gpio_set_debounce_timeout() to
> > gpiod_set_debounce_timeout().
>
> No, that's not true. This one is inline with the other gpio_set() _internal_
> APIs. If renamed, should be done consistently.
>

All the other ones are static to gpiolib.c. With static symbols the
naming convention is a bit more relaxed throughout the kernel. But I
do agree and I will get to them in time. :)

Bart