On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:29:23PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm removing instances of users of internal GPIOLIB headers which should > not be included by anyone but GPIO core code. The pinctrl-da9062 driver > uses gpiochip_get_desc() which we should put into the gpio/driver.h > header as it does sometimes make sense for GPIO providers to get its own > descriptors without having to go through gpiochip_request_own_desc(). Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx> -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: da9062: don't pull in internal GPIOLIB headers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: da9062: don't pull in internal GPIOLIB headers
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 15:15:09 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20230901112926.13216-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20230901112926.13216-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- References:
- [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: da9062: don't pull in internal GPIOLIB headers
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: da9062: don't pull in internal GPIOLIB headers
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: remove stray newline in gpio/driver.h
- Next by Date: Re: [RFT PATCH v2] spi: bcm2835: reduce the abuse of the GPIO API
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: da9062: don't include private GPIOLIB header
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: da9062: don't pull in internal GPIOLIB headers
- Index(es):
 |