On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 6:41 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My preference would be for a separate nb for the chip removal to keep > those two classes of events distinct. That's a good point. Bart do you think you can rework it as such? Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:00:16 +0200
- In-reply-to: <ZN2k7gemanIpbyFh@sol>
- References: <20230816122032.15548-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <CACRpkdaTUi0r+nY12J8sLxmvfG2xRd+OMngcMiQkr5cqerevtA@mail.gmail.com> <ZN2k7gemanIpbyFh@sol>
- References:
- [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
- From: Kent Gibson
- [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] gpio: update Intel LJCA USB GPIO driver
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
- Index(es):
 |