On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 1:57 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 8:48 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > After we remove a GPIO chip that still has some requested descriptors, > > gpiod_free_commit() will fail and we will never put the references to the > > GPIO device and the owning module in gpiod_free(). > > > > Rework this function to: > > - not warn on desc == NULL as this is a use-case on which most free > > functions silently return > > - put the references to desc->gdev and desc->gdev->owner unconditionally > > so that the release callback actually gets called when the remaining > > references are dropped by external GPIO users > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v1 -> v2: > > - add a comment about why we can't use VALIDATE_DESC_VOID() > > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 16 +++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > index 251c875b5c34..2158067c4fd2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > @@ -2167,12 +2167,18 @@ static bool gpiod_free_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc) > > > > void gpiod_free(struct gpio_desc *desc) > > { > > - if (desc && desc->gdev && gpiod_free_commit(desc)) { > > - module_put(desc->gdev->owner); > > - gpio_device_put(desc->gdev); > > - } else { > > + /* > > + * We must not use VALIDATE_DESC_VOID() as the underlying gdev->chip > > + * may already be NULL but we still want to put the references. > > + */ > > + if (!desc) > > + return; > > + > > + if (!gpiod_free_commit(desc)) > > WARN_ON(extra_checks); > > - } > > + > > + gpio_device_put(desc->gdev); > > + module_put(desc->gdev->owner); > > } > > > > /** > > -- > > 2.39.2 > > > > Queued for fixes. > > Bartosz Eek, I need to back it out. I realized there's an issue with this patch. I'll send a v3. Bartosz