On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 11:14 AM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:04:12PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 4:42 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > ... > > > > > + scoped_guard(mutex, &chip->lock) > > > > + bitmap_replace(chip->value_map, chip->value_map, bits, mask, > > > > + gc->ngpio); > > > > > > Perhaps with {} ? > > > > This scoped_guard() thing is in essence a for loop, so I believe > > kernel coding style applies and a single statement doesn't require a > > {}. > > You have two lines (or single wrapped line). I found to read it better with {}. > It's just a broken line, not a compound statement. Matter of personal taste. :) Bart