On Thursday, July 27, 2023 6:40:24 PM CEST Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > This will break some older PXA boards (such as Spitz) as they still > > seem to rely on fixed GPIO numbers with gpio_request and such. > > So...? Why do you think this patch can be accepted? Understandable, I'll drop it. Regards, Duje
Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
- From: Duje Mihanović <duje.mihanovic@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 23:18:08 +0200
- In-reply-to: <ZMKd+CoWu7QjOxHo@smile.fi.intel.com>
- References: <20230727162909.6031-1-duje.mihanovic@skole.hr> <20230727162909.6031-3-duje.mihanovic@skole.hr> <ZMKd+CoWu7QjOxHo@smile.fi.intel.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
- References:
- [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
- From: Duje Mihanović
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: sama5d2-piobu: remove unneeded call to platform_set_drvdata()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] soundwire: bus: Allow SoundWire peripherals to register IRQ handlers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: pxa: use dynamic allocation of base
- Index(es):
 |