Re: [libgpiod][PATCH] tools: clarify the non-option arguments in help text

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 02:12:22PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> We already use [] for optional and <> for required arguments in help text
> but let's make it clear that we can pass multiple chips/lines and in most
> tools only the first one is required.

I agree with Kent, I prefer the former over the latter.

And with this syntax the reality looks as

	[chip1 [chip2] ...]

rather than ambiguous [x] [y] where I can't understand what is the meaning
of the chip1 be omitted while chip2 is present.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko