On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 4:23 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ideally the GPIO chip data structure has to be constant. > In real life it's not true, but we can make it closer to > that. Hence the series. The series looks completely reasonable to me: Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpiolib: Avoid modifying GPIO chip fwnode
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpiolib: Avoid modifying GPIO chip fwnode
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 11:11:41 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20230703142308.5772-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20230703142308.5772-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/3] gpiolib: Avoid modifying GPIO chip fwnode
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v2 0/3] gpiolib: Avoid modifying GPIO chip fwnode
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFT] pinctrl: renesas: rzv2m: Handle non-unique subnode names
- Next by Date: RE: [PATCH/RFT] pinctrl: renesas: rzv2m: Handle non-unique subnode names
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpiolib: of: Don't use GPIO chip fwnode in of_gpiochip_*()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] gpiolib: Avoid modifying GPIO chip fwnode
- Index(es):
 |