Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domains for SDX75

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 +
>  include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h                  | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> index afad313..58e1be8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties:
>        - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
>        - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd
>        - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd
> +      - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd
>        - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd
>        - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd
>        - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
>  #define SDX65_CX_AO	4
>  #define SDX65_MXC	5
>  
> +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */
> +#define SDX75_CX	0
> +#define SDX75_CX_AO	1
> +#define SDX75_MSS	2
> +#define SDX75_MX	3
> +#define SDX75_MX_AO	4
> +#define SDX75_MXC	5
Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix
(i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long
and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after
we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the
existing ones retroactively..

Konrad
> +
>  /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */
>  #define SM6350_CX	0
>  #define SM6350_GFX	1