Re: [PATCH libgpiod 4/4] bindings: rust: clippy: silence false-positive on iterator

["Erik Schilling" <erik.schilling@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri Jun 30, 2023 at 12:19 PM CEST, Kent Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:05:28PM +0200, Erik Schilling wrote:
> > On Fri Jun 30, 2023 at 11:08 AM CEST, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > > (I am seeing this one test failure on arm32, but that doesn't seem to be related
> > > to this patch:
> > > ---- request_config::verify::default stdout ----
> > > thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
> > >   left: `OperationFailed(RequestConfigGetConsumer, Errno { code: 2, description: Some("No such file or directory") })`,
> > >  right: `OperationFailed(RequestConfigGetConsumer, Errno { code: 0, description: Some("Success") })`', libgpiod/tests/request_config.rs:18:13
> > > note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
> > >
> > > Not sure if that is a genuine bug or something funky in my build.)
> > 
> > Is the GPIO_SIM module loaded? Did you test with a custom kernel or
> > some distro that ships with it?
> > 
>
> That is the only test failing out of the whole suite, so gpiosim is not
> the problem.
>
> That is with the latest from the Raspberry Pi rpi-6.4.y branch[1]
> (a867309b7a55 so a few days old now), with CONFIG_GPIO_SIM so that I can
> run the tests.
> Happens to be running on a Pi ZeroW, but I don't think that test is speed
> sensitive.  I have done a complete rebuild - same result.
>
> Are there any distos enabling GPIO_SIM yet?

Fedora does now (after I asked for it [2]). But it does not support any
32-bit ARM targets anymore :/. Can you try reproducing it without the
patches? I would be surprised if this was related to the patches.

I will rebuild my armv7hf VM soon and retry with a self-built kernel.
but not sure when I will get around that.

[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215980

- Erik