On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:53 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It seems there is no driver that requires custom IRQ chip > domain options. Drop the member and respective code. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Applied, thanks! Bart
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 15:01:08 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20230616135313.76338-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20230616135313.76338-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: Fix irq_domain resource tracking for gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: intel: simplify exit path of ->gpio_request_enable() hook
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio: synq: remove unused zynq_gpio_irq_reqres/zynq_gpio_irq_relres
- Index(es):
 |