Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:54:59PM +0100, Charles Keepax kirjoitti: > From: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Currently the in-band alerts for SoundWire peripherals can only > be communicated to the driver through the interrupt_callback > function. This however is slightly inconvient for devices that wish to > share IRQ handling code between SoundWire and I2C/SPI, the later would > normally register an IRQ handler with the IRQ subsystem. However there > is no reason the SoundWire in-band IRQs can not also be communicated > as an actual IRQ to the driver. > > Add support for SoundWire peripherals to register a normal IRQ handler > to receive SoundWire in-band alerts, allowing code to be shared across > control buses. Note that we allow users to use both the > interrupt_callback and the IRQ handler, this is useful for devices which > must clear additional chip specific SoundWire registers that are not a > part of the normal IRQ flow, or the SoundWire specification. ... > + bus->irq_chip.name = dev_name(bus->dev); > + bus->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, SDW_MAX_DEVICES, &sdw_domain_ops, bus); I'm wondering why you are not using existing fwnode, if any (e.g. from parent device). > + if (!bus->domain) { > + dev_err(bus->dev, "Failed to add IRQ domain\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko