On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 04:30:44PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > …, because asked lenght … > > * Are there any chances to avoid a typo in such a change description? Not anymore as explained in the other email, but thanks for pointing this out. > * Was a cover letter accidentally omitted? What do you want to see in such cover letter? How can it be helpful? (Note that these are rhetorical towards this change, as it's already in the non-rebased branch) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in pinmux_select()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in pinmux_select()
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 18:35:13 +0300
- In-reply-to: <39569326-6b1c-39b1-0eb2-f1c1d11251ec@web.de>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20230604131215.78847-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <39569326-6b1c-39b1-0eb2-f1c1d11251ec@web.de>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in pinmux_select()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in pinmux_select()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: Relax user input size in pinmux_select()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: intel: simplify exit path of ->gpio_request_enable() hook
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in pinmux_select()
- Next by thread: [libgpiod][PATCH V2] tools: gpiomon/gpionotify: add idle-timeout option
- Index(es):
 |