> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 01:55:36PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > > Utilize a temporary variable for common shift operation inside > > ->set_mux() hook and improve readability. > > Seems the bloat-o-meter statistics is missing here. I changed the commit message as pointed out by Mika in v1. Do I change it back?
RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: intel: refine set_mux hook
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: intel: refine set_mux hook
- From: "Jadav, Raag" <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 07:15:59 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- In-reply-to: <ZINWOWLjyZk2Gj3j@smile.fi.intel.com>
- References: <20230609082539.24311-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20230609082539.24311-2-raag.jadav@intel.com> <ZINWOWLjyZk2Gj3j@smile.fi.intel.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: intel: refine set_mux hook
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: intel: refine set_mux hook
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/4] Minor improvements for Intel pinctrl
- From: Raag Jadav
- [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: intel: refine set_mux hook
- From: Raag Jadav
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: intel: refine set_mux hook
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v2 0/4] Minor improvements for Intel pinctrl
- Prev by Date: Re: [libgpiod][bug] building rust bindings requires clang headers
- Next by Date: [libgpiod] Owners of libgiod* crates.io packages
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: intel: refine set_mux hook
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: intel: refine set_mux hook
- Index(es):
 |