On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 3:12 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is debugfs and there is no much sense to strict the user from > sending as much data as they can. The memdup_user_nul() will anyway > fail if there is not enough memory. > > Relax the user input size by removing an artificial limitaion. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fair enough, patch applied! Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: Relax user input size in pinmux_select()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: Relax user input size in pinmux_select()
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 09:22:11 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20230604131215.78847-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20230604131215.78847-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20230604131215.78847-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in pinmux_select()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: Relax user input size in pinmux_select()
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in pinmux_select()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: Duplicate user memory in one go in pinmux_select()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpiolib: Do not unexport GPIO on freeing
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: Relax user input size in pinmux_select()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: Relax user input size in pinmux_select()
- Index(es):
 |