On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 16:30:26 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/06/2023 16:05, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Some variants in this series of UART controllers have GPIO pins that > > are shared between GPIO and modem control lines. > > > > The pin mux mode (GPIO or modem control lines) can be set for each > > ports (channels) supported by the variant. > > > > This adds a property to the device tree to set the GPIO pin mux to > > modem control lines on selected ports if needed. > > > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 6.1.x > > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt | 46 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt > > index 0fa8e3e43bf8..1a7e4bff0456 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt > > @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ Optional properties: > > 1 = active low. > > - irda-mode-ports: An array that lists the indices of the port that > > should operate in IrDA mode. > > +- nxp,modem-control-line-ports: An array that lists the indices of the port that > > + should have shared GPIO lines configured as > > + modem control lines. > > > > Example: > > sc16is750: sc16is750@51 { > > @@ -35,6 +38,26 @@ Example: > > #gpio-cells = <2>; > > }; > > > > + sc16is752: sc16is752@53 { > > Since you keep sending new versions, fix the names. nNode names should > be generic. See also explanation and list of examples in DT specification: > https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation Hi, by the way, I do not "keep sending new versions" just for the fun of it... Even after reading your link, I cannot see what is wrong with that name. You are the first one since V1 to think it is inappropriate. Please suggest what the name should be. Hugo.